| Smoker's stories and comments | ||
|
From The
Punch Dad’s last gasper: burying the argument for smoking By
Adam Ferrier
May 6,
2010 My dad was a pack a day smoker of Marlboro Reds, he died of cancer in
1996. This is a picture of my three brothers and I carrying him into the
funeral service in his coffin. Welcome to
Marlboro Country: Adam's Dad prepares to light up one last time. If you look carefully you will notice the coffin is painted as a carton
of cigarettes, Marlboro Reds to be exact (it was painted on my dad’s
request by my talented sister Tania Ferrier). Dad loved his smokes and didn’t appreciate anyone saying he couldn’t
smoke. In fact, just before dad died he asked me to give his eulogy and
remind everyone that he wanted to be cremated so he ‘could light up
one last time’. He was a relatively conservative chap - but one with a
wicked sense of humour, and I guess a fierce sense of brand loyalty. I’ve never had a cigarette in my life, for some reason it’s never had
much appeal to me. Correct me if I’m wrong but smoking, as far as I
can tell, is the only legal product in the world that if used exactly to
the manufacturers directions will do you harm. Guns, alcohol, driving a
car or motorbike or scooter, sugary foods, gambling and TV can all be
used in a safe, useful, enjoyable manner. All, like everything are open
to abuse, but all can be used safely and harmlessly. Cigarettes, on the other hand, can’t be used in a harmless manner.
Even in moderation they are doing the smoker (and those around them)
harm. For this important reason, cigarettes are categorically different
to any other legal product in the world - and therefore should have
their own set of rules. Bring on the regulations. So it is with interest that I examine the moves by the federal government
last week to remove all branding from cigarettes, and raise the price
(again). I can only applaud the Federal Government for their actions. They have
systematically pulled all of the marketing levers out from under the
cigarette companies feet. They’ve restricted placement where they can
be enjoyed. They’ve raised the price. They’ve stopped broadcast
communications. They’ve massively restricted sponsorships. All of these initiatives have, according to Quit Australia helped reduce the smoking rate in
Australia from approximately 35% of the adult population in 1980 to well
under 20% today. The proposed restrictions on packaging will no doubt
also be effective. The government wants to ban all branding devices such
as logos, colours and fonts. Research shows that increasingly plainer
packaging makes cigarettes appear less aspirational, less tasty, less
satisfying, and of poorer quality to smokers. These continuing
initiatives will ensure the smoking rates continue to fall. All other
things being equal we’ll consequently be healthier, and therefore
perhaps even happier. I’m not sure how my dad would react to the proposed changes. He was
pro-freedom of choice, and an ardent supporter of smokers rights. I feel
quite differently. Whichever side you’re on - I guess the picture
speaks for itself.
Back to Smokers'
stories index |
||
|
Page last updated 11/5/10 |