The packaging of tobacco is a major
part of its advertising - as the tobacco industry admits
in its own
documents. That's why ASH and many other organisations support mandated
plain standardised packaging of tobacco products - and why
the industry is fighting it.
The
sovereignty of countries should be absolute and not influenced by
multinational companies with complex accountability. This laudable move
towards plain packaging must not be derailed by veiled tactics from
companies with vested interests. Only then can progress be made to
tackle tobacco-associated diseases, which are largely preventable, but
mostly lethal.
The
Lancet medical journal, August 2011
NEWS
WORLDWIDE DEVELOPMENTS
BACKGROUND
EVIDENCE AND RESOURCES
TOBACCO INDUSTRY'S
"PLAIN PACK ATTACK"
Australia's world
first plain
packs legislation
Read the two Acts: Tobacco
Plain Packaging Act 2011
and Trademarks
Amendment (Tobacco Plain Packaging) Act 2011
See also submissions
to public consultation, June 2011; submissions, transcripts
to House of Reps inquiry 2011

What the new packs will look like
- and see high
resolution images
LATEST NEWS
Timeline
of key events in the battle for plain packaging
UK about to launch plain packs
consultation
January 2012: The UK government is
expected to launch its public consultation on mandatory plain tobacco
packaging in March, following Australia's historic enactment of the health
policy. ASH Australia director Prof Simon Chapman has told UK health
leaders plain packs will help "make smoking history" and
"the dominos are lining up". The
Guardian 24/1/12
Feb. 2012: UK tobacco industry launches its anti-plain packs website
including the usual discredited claims of "no evidence" and
"What next?"
Government accuses Philip Morris of
corporate "trick"
December 2012: Attorney-General Nicola Roxon says Philip Morris has used
"every trick in the book" including "corporate
restructuring" to help its legal challenge to plain packaging. The
government has asked the Arbitral Tribunal to reject a Philip Morris Asia
case under an Australia- Hong Kong investment treaty because PM Asia did not
acquire its share in the Australia operation until almost a year after the
plain packs policy was announced. Sydney
Morning Herald 22/12/11
The government says it's determined to maintain transparency by updating the
case at
Attorney-General's
website
Philip Morris hid harm from additives: Independent
(UK) 21/12/11
Full
study ASH
release 22/12/11
Philip Morris International joins in High
Court litigation
December 2011: Philip
Morris International Inc. joins its Hong Kong subsidiary in suing the
Australian Government over plain packaging. PMI is taking action in the High
Court, along with other tobacco companies BAT, Imperial and Japan
Tobacco. Philip Morris Asia Ltd launched an arbitration case over the
law in November under Australia's bilateral investment treaty with Hong
Kong. Law360
20/12/11
JTI joins High Court
action: PRNewswire
14/12/11
Roxon will continue plain packs fight as
Attorney-General
December 2011: Nicola Roxon, promoted
from Health Minister to become Australia's first female
Attorney-General, has promised to use her legal skills "take the fight
up to big tobacco" in defending the plain packs legislation against the
industry's legal challenges. The new Health Minister is Tanya Plibersek,
promoted to Cabinet. Prime
Minister Gillard release 12/12/11
Herald
Sun 12/12/11 Nicola Roxon media statement 12/12/11
(not online)
UK will begin wide consultation on plain
packs
December 2011: The UK government will
start a wide-ranging consultation by the end of this year on plain tobacco
packaging options, following Australia's landmark decision.
Reuters
6/12/11 New
Zealand also keen to move: 3news
NZ 12/11/11
Plain pack laws enacted as Big Tobacco
sues
December 2011: Australia's tobacco
plain packaging legislation receives Royal Assent.
Preliminary stages begin, tobacco
companies having exactly one year to comply by December 1, 2012. Minister
Roxon says cigarette packs will
now "only serve as a stark reminder of the devastating health effects
of smoking." As expected, BAT and Imperial lodge High Court challenges
- joining Philip Morris, who took legal action last month.
Australian 1/12/11
Minister
Roxon release 1/12/11 Imperial High Court action:
MSNBC
report 5/12/11
Coalition mostly favoured tobacco industry
in parliament debates
December 2011: Hansard transcripts of
Australian parliamentary debates on plain packaging from July to November
2011 show Coalition MPs mostly supporting views promoted by the tobacco
industry. ASH
analysis 6/12/12
Bills passed by Australian Parliament
November 2011: Australia's tobacco plain
packaging bills passed by Parliament, to take full effect December 1, 2012. Philip Morris
sues as threatened, though seen by
independent legal experts as unlikely to succeed. Minister
Roxon release 21/11/11
"Tobacco diseases can be prevented if countries unite":
ASH
Australia media release 21/11/11 Philip
Morris sues: PM
Asia release 21/11/11 Tobacco.org
news 21/11/11
NZ "actively considers" following
Australia into plain tobacco packaging
November 2011: New Zealand's government is "actively
considering" following Australia's lead and introducing plain tobacco
packaging. Tobacco industry already threatening the kinds of
legal action assessed as "unfounded" and "vexatious" by Australian independent legal experts. 3news
NZ 12/11/11
Australian bills passed by Senate
November 2011: Australia's plain packaging bills pass the Senate - now
return to the House of Reps for final rubber stamp. Guardian,
10/11/11 Plain
packs "triumph": ACOSH-PHAA
release 10/11/11 GPs welcome "gutsy" reform: AGPN
release 11/11/10 Report in Nature
11/11/11
42-NGO call for speedy Senate passage
after plain packs delay
November 2011: 42 NGOs urge speedy Senate passage of the plain tobacco packaging
bills. Date of
full effect has already been delayed five months (see
below), after holdups in the
Senate. 42 NGOs support
speedy passage: ASH
/ Protecting Children from Tobacco release 4/11/11 Government
pushes Nov 10 Senate
vote: Sky
News 3/11/11 Date of effect delayed: The
Age, Melbourne 2/11/11
Revised timetable for legislation taking
effect
November 2011: Federal Government announces revised
timetable for introduction of plain packs, after Senate delays. Preliminary
stages to start from
Royal Assent (previously 1 January); offences re Australian manufacture of non-compliant product
to start
1 October
2012 (was 20 May); all tobacco products
sold in plain packs from 1 December (was 1 July). Also
a minor Government amendment to permit rounded corners
on inside lip of packs. ASH Australia
Government
seeks input on non-cig products and pack warnings
October 2011: Public consultation ends on proposed plain packaging for
non-cigarette tobacco products - cigars, cigarillos, roll-your-own, pipe tobacco. Non-cigarette regulations
to be finalised before new plain pack laws take effect. Consultation
paper Separate review of proposed expanded pack
health warnings
being undertaken by ACCC after public input ended October 17. Consultation
Australia reassures World Trade
Organization on plain packs
October 2011: The World Trade
Organization debates Australia's tobacco plain pack bills. Some
tobacco-producing countries claim the law would violate TRIPS
Agreement obligations, but many countries back overriding public health policy rights.
Australia assures WTO members the policy will not violate TRIPS and will be effective in reducing smoking. More:
WORLDWIDE DEVELOPMENTS
Australian bills delayed again
October 2011: Passage of Australia's
Plain Pack bills held up in the Senate in fierce debate over a carbon tax. Health Minister Roxon
accuses the Opposition of "delaying tactics" and
"playing into the hands of big tobacco" and warns implementation may now be delayed. The
Australian 13/10/11
WHO chief slams industry Dirty Tricks
against plain packs
October 2011: World Health Organization Director-General Margaret Chan slams
tobacco industry for "dirty tricks" in trying to block tobacco-free policies
worldwide, and false claims that plain packs violate international
trade obligations. Urges all countries to "stand firm together, do
not bow to pressure... we must never allow the tobacco industry to get the
upper hand". AFP
report 11/10/11
Canada passes
packet warning increase as world applauds Australia
September 2011: Canada approves bigger graphic health warnings on tobacco packs, as world leaders welcome
Australia's plain packs move. Canada will put graphic warnings
on 75% of both front and back of packs by June 2012. Australia is first to
adopt plain packs, but Canada along with
many other countries has expressed interest in doing so. American
Broadcasting Corp report 29/9/11
Tobacco legal
challenges "huff and puff" and "largely vexatious"
September 2011: Tobacco industry legal case against plain packs dismissed as "huff and
puff" by Health Minister, "vexatious"
by legal experts. Minister
Roxon rejects industry threats, quotes
expert opinions that the bills align with
international law. Minister
release 14/9/11
ANU expert in intellectual property law Prof Matthew
Rimmer tells Senate inquiry tobacco industry threats "largely
vexatious", bills consistent with Australian laws, treaty
commitments; Big
Tobacco claims
for compensation billions "outlandish", "greedy" in light of its "untold damage" to health.
ANU
release 14/9/11
BATA exploits
refugee controversy to question plain pack legality
September 2011: BAT Australia places full-page ads in major newspapers exploiting legal controversy
over refugee policy to cast doubt on legality of plain tobacco packaging
bills. The ad asks "Is the government's legal advice on shaky
ground?" BATA
ad in Sydney Telegraph 7/9/11, p. 22
BATA challenges
bills in High Court
September 2011: British American Tobacco
Australia (BATA) applies for special leave to appeal in the High Court
to gain access to government legal advice on the plain pack
bills. BATA warns it will immediately mount a High Court challenge
to the bills if passed by the Senate. BATA
release 5/9/11
Lower house
passes landmark bills
August 2011: Australia's House of
Representatives passes both Tobacco Plain Packaging bills. All parties and independents supported
the main bill; the Liberal/National parties opposed the Trade Marks bill,
which was referred to a Senate inquiry. Minister
Roxon release 24/8/11 House of Reps Hansard proof 24/8/11
- pp. 22-99 with voting at pp. 98-99. The Plain Packs bill was supported
unanimously. A Liberal amendment to allow some
trademarks on smaller surfaces was defeated, and the Trade
Marks Bill supported, in both cases by majorities of 5 - the ALP,
Greens, independents Oakeshott, Wilkie and Windsor, and Independent WA
National Crook all combining to defeat the Liberal/National Parties; Independent Katter
not present or abstaining.
Leading
Australians back plain packs
August 2011: 260 health and medical
professors including four Australians of the Year write to Federal
MPs urging them to end the long delay and pass the plain packaging
bills. The
Australian 24/8/11
and Cancer
Council Australia media release 24/8/11
Inquiry
endorses plain packs: now get on with it, say health groups
August 2011: ASH Australia and
the Heart Foundation welcome House of Representatives inquiry report
endorsing the plain pack bills - and urge parliament to get on
with passing them. After lengthy public consultation and the inquiry, the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Health and
Ageing unanimously recommended passage of both bills. ASH
/ Heart Foundation release 22/8/11
... but Senate sends trademarks
bill to further inquiry
August
2011: The
Senate sends one of the
Plain Packs bills to yet another inquiry - this time to check constitutionality. The Trade Marks Amendment (Tobacco Plain Packaging) Bill
2011 amends the
Trade Marks Act 1995 to allow regulations on
plain packaging so businesses are not prevented from
registering or protecting trademarks. Inquiry
site
The Opposition gives its support for the substantive Plain Packaging Bill,
but not the Trade Marks Bill - saying it is
"unnecessary". Sydney
Morning Herald 17/8/11
Public support for plain packs down but
still ahead
August 2011: Public support for plain
packaging has been eroded by the tobacco industry's multi-million dollar
mass media scare campaign - but at 48% is still well ahead of opposition
(38%) says a Newspoll survey. The
Australian 20/8/11
Tobacco
loses bid to dig out government's privileged legal advice
August 2011: BAT and Philip Morris fail in legal actions to gain access to government legal advice on plain
packs, ruled legally privileged by the Admin Appeals Tribunal and Federal Court.
Philip Morris lost its action in the AAT, which ruled the advice legally
privileged and no overriding public interest in revealing it.
Canberra
Times 20/8/11 and
AAT
decision 15/8/11 in Philip Morris Limited v Prime Minister
[2011] AATA 556 on FOI application by PML June 2010 for access to
documents held by Prime Minister's office. BATA was joined as
party to PMI's appeal to the AAT; but Full
Federal Court appeal lodged by BATA alone, seeking
access to 1995 legal advice held by Dept of Health and Ageing - Bloomberg
news 3/8/11
... this appeal was also lost - Federal
Court decision published 23/8/11.
BAT "disappointed", may appeal to High Court
- Melbourne
Age 23/8/11
Indonesia,
Mexico complain plain packaging will "hurt trade"
August
2011: Indonesia and Mexico submissions to Australian parliamentary inquiry
complain that mandatory plain tobacco packs are "unnecessarily restrictive" and a "barrier" to their
tobacco trade. Melbourne
Herald Sun 16/8/11 and
inquiry
submissions - Indonesia no. 56, Mexico no. 58
BAT
bull, bullying, bluff and bafflement in plain pack hearing
August
2011: British American Tobacco Australia chief David Crow tells parliamentary hearing the proposed
timetable for mandatory plain packs is "impossible", will
cause shortages, feed black markets. Health leaders say the industry is
"bluffing" after years of warning. Melbourne
Age, 5/8/11
Also
addressing House of Reps committee: National Preventative Health Agency,
Health Dept, health groups - who outline worldwide evidence, warn tobacco industry claims
can't be trusted. Inquiry
site including transcripts
More on the BAT testimony in TOBACCO INDUSTRY'S
"PLAIN PACK ATTACK"

Roxon stands up to Big
Tobacco
Health Minister's gutsy fight with
the tobacco industry to introduce plain packaging
Australian
Financial Review Magazine feature 29/7/11
National
survey of illicit tobacco use shows industry claims fanciful
July 2011: National government
survey of over 26,000 confirms tobacco industry exaggerated claims on extent of illicit tobacco use. 2010
National Drug Strategy Household Survey shows only 1.5% of smokers use loose
unbranded "chop chop" more than half the time, only
4.9% use at all (down from 6.1% in 2007); just 4.6% of smokers
believe they may have bought counterfeit cigs even once a month.
Demolishes tobacco industry claim that 16% (and rising) of tobacco
sold in Australia is illicit. 2010
AIHW survey
Tables 3.11 & 3.12, pp.39-40 Compare
tobacco-commissioned Deloitte
report, Feb 2011
Big
Tobacco misleads retailers; offers Fiji hols for pushing
July 2011: Some retailers are concerned at misleading flyers distributed
to them by
Imperial Tobacco urging them to protest about plain packs to current House of Representatives inquiry.
Meanwhile BAT Australia criticised by ASH for offering Fiji holidays to
retailers pushing tobacco. Imperial
flyers BAT
retailer Fiji promotion and Telegraph
report 24/7/11
Australia's
plain packaging legislation introduced
July 2011: Australia's world-first legislation to fully mandate
plain packaging of tobacco by July 2012 is introduced to parliament -
expected to pass both houses of parliament later in the year. ABC
news report 6/7/11
Read the two bills here
and here
- and all submissions
to public consultation
The legislation was referred
to a House
of Reps Committee which
took more submissions and is expected to report
to the House when it resumes on August 16.
NZ
backs Australia over plain packs move
June 2011: New Zealand government supports Australia's move to mandate
plain tobacco packs, hopes to follow suit. Assoc. Health
Minister Tariana Turia is "very supportive of Australia's initiative and it is our expectation
that New Zealand will inevitably follow their lead." stuff.co.nz
report 29/6/11
Tobacco
industry continues bull and bullying against bill
June, 2011: As the Australian government
prepares to introduce legislation after public consultation, the tobacco industry
continues to mislead and threaten in its bid to derail the key health
policy.
-
Philip
Morris launches legal action against the government, claiming the
bills breach a 1993 Australia-Hong Kong bilateral trade agreement.
Philip
Morris release 27/6/11 Australian 27/6/11
Philip Morris suit "frivolous treaty shopping": ANU
legal experts Canberra
Times, 28/6/11
-
Imperial Tobacco
launches "No Nanny
State" campaign: media ads, website,
MP postcards
and lifesized
cutouts carpet-bombed into retailers nationwide. "Nanny State" line
ignores evidence
showing plain packs will
discourage uptake by children - main
source of smoking recruitment. "Nanny
State" pure fairytale: SMH
online 28/6/11
-
British American
Tobacco pushes for delay - 1/7/12 start date "unworkable",
"unrealistic" says BAT submission to consultation. Australian 8/6/11
BAT launches Illicit
Tobacco site with inflated, fanciful
"costs" of illicit trade to individual electorates - drawn from flawed Deloittes report commissioned by
Big Tobacco. See
critique
of report
Coalition
backs plain packs bill as Minister wins world awards
May
2011: Liberal leader Tony Abbott says Opposition will not oppose plain
packs bill - will move
amendments but not oppose the bill if they fail. ABC
news 31/5/11 Multipartisan support
"breath of fresh air, especially for children": ASH, 42 NGOs. ASH
/ Protecting Children from Tobacco release 31/5/11
Also on World No Tobacco Day (May 31), Health Minister Nicola Roxon wins world
(WHO) and Australian (Nigel Gray) tobacco control awards for her stand
on plain packaging and other health policies. Transcript
of presentations, Canberra 31/5/11

Plain
packs focus eyes on health warnings: study
May
2011: UK study of eye movements of non-and-occasional
smokers shows they're more likely to look at health warnings on plain
than branded packs. For less frequent smokers (e.g. children,
quitters), plain
packs "increase visual attention
towards health warning information and away from brand information."
Abstract
and
Guardian 30/5/11
Support
for plain packs outnumbers opposition by over 2:1
May 2011: Public support for
plain tobacco packaging withstands tobacco industry's multi-million mass
media onslaught. Community support still
outnumbers opposition by more than 2:1, 59% to 24%, says Newspoll phone survey of
1200 Australians. ABC
News 29/5/11
Malaysia
lobbied to derail Australian bills
May 2011: A high-powered US
consultant linked to the tobacco industry has lobbied Malaysia to oppose
Australia's plain packaging laws, and powerful US congressmen are
helping the industry use its "global economic power" to block
the world-first bill. ABC
news report 26/5/11
Australia
leading the war on tobacco, says WHO regional chief
May 2011: Australia's plain
packaging bill "would set new global standards and encourage
governments in the Asia Pacific Region to also get tough with the
tobacco industry" says the WHO's Western Pacific Regional Director
Dr Shin Young-Soo. ABC
The Drum opinion 26/5/11
Three Coalition MPs support plain packs bill - pressure grows on Abbott
May
2011: Three Coalition MPs say they'll cross the floor to vote for the plain
packs bill, putting pressure on Opposition Leader Tony Abbott to ensure multi-partisan
support. Other
Liberal MPs expected to follow suit. SMH 24/5/11
and Dr Washer in
Age 22/5/11 Ken Wyatt later
says he might not cross; but WA independent National MP Tony Crook weigh in, so
still 3 coalition MPs support. SMH
24/5/11
Research
review shows two decades of evidence for plain packs
May
2011: Review of two decades of research on plain packs shows they'll improve effectiveness of health warnings, reduce misconceptions
and appeal, especially to children. Quit/Cancer
Council Vic review of published studies also finds no legal
barriers; tobacco industry claims on illicit trade
"exaggerated and misleading." Evidence
review May 2011
Minister:
We won't be intimidated by false tobacco trade law claims
May 2011: Trade
Minister Craig Emerson blasts tobacco companies'
"false" claims plain packs would
breach trade agreements. Australia "won't be threatened or intimidated by big
tobacco" or "subjugate...
national sovereignty in any trade agreement." Australian 19/5/11
Legal EVIDENCE
Victorian
Liberal government joins NSW to back plain tobacco packs
May 2011: Victorian
government declares support for mandatory plain packs. SkyNews
18/5/11
Joins NSW Coalition government - declared support on May 6.
NSW
Health Minister release 6/5/11
World-first draft legislation
tabled: Government
consultation paper and draft bill
April
2011: ASH Australia and many others welcome world-first plain pack bill as lifesaving policy to end marketing of
tobacco diseases in glossy boxes. Draft bill would mandate generic packaging of all tobacco products
by July 2012. Minister's release 7/4/11
AAP/SMH
report 7/4/11
ASH congratulates Minister,
Government for putting health first; urges all parties to support. ASH
release 7/4/11
Minister
recommits to plain packaging policy
Feb. 2011: Health Minister
Roxon says government "absolutely determined" to
mandate plain packs by July 2012.
Roxon
on ABC Lateline 13/9/10 Minister says
other countries look to Australia; tobacco industry
fights "tooth and nail" but "inevitable". Sydney
Morning Herald 15/10/10
Health
groups' counter-campaign
2010: Health groups hit back, asking "Who's pulling the
strings?" in ad campaign countering the tobacco industry ads.
See health
groups' counter-ad ABC-TV "Gruen Transfer" discussion on YouTube
World-first
legislation flagged
2010: Australian
government announces plain packaging of tobacco products to take full
effect by July 2012 - first country in the world to set a deadline.
See below,
BACKGROUND Tobacco companies immediately
launch
mass media campaign against
it. See below, TOBACCO INDUSTRY
Preventative Health
Taskforce recommends plain packaging
2009: Taskforce report says Australia should adopt mandatory
plain packaging and larger health warnings. Action
Area 5, pp. 181-5 of NPHT
2009 report tobacco chapter
Youth call for plain
packaging
2009: Youth groups call for plain packaging of tobacco products on
National Youth Tobacco Free Day. See
Cancer
Council ACT media release 27/3/09
WORLDWIDE
DEVELOPMENTS
See also History
of Plain Packaging: world timeline from 1986-present
UK
about to launch plain packs consultation
January 2012: The UK government is
expected to launch its public consultation on mandatory plain tobacco
packaging in March, following Australia's historic enactment of the health
policy. ASH Australia director Prof Simon Chapman has told UK health leaders
plain packs will help "make smoking history" and "the dominos
are lining up". The
Guardian 24/1/12
Minister
outlines treaty obligations
November
2011: Australian Health
Minister Nicola Roxon explains how the plain pack law will "give
effect" to obligations under the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco
Control (FCTC), including:
-
Article
5 requires signatories to develop/implement comprehensive
national tobacco control strategies, programs; effective legislative, other measures to prevent/reduce tobacco
consumption, addiction, smoke exposure.
-
Article
11 requires effective measures to ensure packaging does not promote tobacco
by being false or misleading about characteristics, health effects, hazards,
emissions.
-
Article
13 requires comprehensive bans on tobacco
advertising, promotion, sponsorship.
-
Guidelines
adopted by Conference of the Parties to the FCTC for Article 11 and
Article 13 recommend governments consider introducing plain packaging.
Ministerial
memo Nov 2011
NZ
"actively considers" following Australia into plain tobacco
packaging
November 2011: New Zealand's government "actively
considering" following Australia's lead and introducing plain
tobacco packaging - while tobacco industry already threatens the
kinds of legal action assessed as "unfounded" and
"largely vexatious" by Australian independent legal
experts. 3news.co.nz
report 12/11/11
Australia
reassures World Trade organization on plain packs
October 2011: World Trade
organisation debates Australia's plain pack
bills. Tobacco-producing countries
claim that
the law will violate TRIPS Agreement obligations by
preventing tobacco companies from using trademarks, "hurting poor
farmers"; would "make counterfeiting easier", or
"cut costs and lower prices". See
answers in
EVIDENCE
below Other
countries support Australia's stand, nations’ health
policy rights. WHO outlines serious global picture, says plain packs in
line with its Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. The
issue also raised in Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)
Committee.
WTO
minutes 24-15/10/11
WHO chief slams industry Dirty Tricks
against plain packs
October 2011: World Health Organization Director-General Margaret Chan slams tobacco industry for "dirty tricks" in trying to block tobacco-free policies
worldwide, falsely claim Australia's plain pack bills violate international
trade obligations. Urges countries to "stand firm together, do
not bow to pressure... we must never allow the tobacco industry to get the
upper hand". AFP
report 11/10/11
Canada passes
packet warning increase as world applauds Australia
September 2011: Canada approves
bigger graphic pack health warnings, as world leaders welcome
Australia's plain pack move. Canada will put graphic warnings
on 75% of both front and back of packs by June 2012. Canada along with
several other countries reported to be watching Australia's reform closely,
considering future policy.
American
Broadcasting Corp report 29/9/11
Malaysia
lobbied to derail Australian bills
May 2011: High-powered US
consultant linked to the tobacco industry lobbies Malaysia to oppose
Australia's initiative; powerful US congressmen helping the industry use
its "global economic power" to block the world-first bill. ABC
news report 26/5/11
Australia
leading the war on tobacco, says WHO regional chief
May 2011: Australia's plain
packaging bill "would set new global standards and encourage
governments in the Asia Pacific Region to also get tough with the
tobacco industry" says WHO's Western Pacific Regional Director Dr
Shin Young-Soo. ABC
The Drum opinion 26/5/11
The world is watching -
see
Framework
Convention Alliance report 21/4/11
Belgium
2011: Belgian Health
Minister, in response to a question in parliament, expresses
support for plain packaging, including at European Union level. French
and Dutch only, pp. 19-20 at Belgian
parliament
Europe
2010: European Commission holds public consultation on
revision to European Union's Tobacco Products Directive. One measure
for consultation is plain/generic packaging. More
France
2010: Introduced into National Assembly by member Yves Bur,
bill...to establish plain and standardized packaging for
cigarettes outlines specifications, Health Minister to
clarify. French
Bill
New
Zealand
2011: New Zealand's government "actively
considering" following Australia's lead and introducing plain
tobacco packaging - while tobacco industry already threatens the
kinds of legal action assessed as "unfounded" and
"largely vexatious" by Australian independent legal
experts. 3news.co.nz
report 12/11/11 Associate
Health Minister says NZ following "inevitable" stuff.co.nz
report 29/6/11
NZ Parliament Maori Affairs Committee report
2010
- see
pp. 16-18
Turkey
2011: Turkey's government is reported to be considering plain
packs legislation - Health Minister Recep Akdag asking Turkish regulatory
officials to work with the WHO towards beginning technical
studies. Bloomberg
News 7/9/11
United Kingdom
January 2012: The UK government is expected to launch its public
consultation on mandatory plain tobacco packaging in March, following
Australia's historic enactment of the health policy. ASH Australia
director Prof Simon Chapman has told UK health leaders plain packs will
help "make tobacco history". The
Guardian 24/1/12
March
2011 government media
release and
UK
plan and more details
2010
White
Paper
BACKGROUND
After a recommendation from the 2009
report of Australia's National Preventative Health Taskforce, on April 29,
2010 the Australian
government announced plain packaging of tobacco products would be fully
implemented by July 2012. Australia was the first country in the world to set a deadline.
ASH Australia and others hailed the decision as a major step in the
fight against tobacco. Government
announcement and
ASH release
29/4/10
Health Minister Roxon and then-PM Rudd announce the plain pack
commitment, 29/4/10
In the leadup
to Australia's 2010 federal elections, the three major
tobacco companies (BAT, Philip Morris, Imperial) poured $5m into a
misleading mass media ad
campaign against plain packs, fronted by hastily-formed
"Australian Alliance of Retailers" (AAR).
ASH
(release 4/8/10) and other groups, and six
Australians of the Year (statement 11/8/10)
condemned the AAR campaign, urged all parties to honour July 2012 commitment.
ALP and
Greens reaffirmed support; Liberal/National parties agreed to "consider" it.
Meanwhile the
campaign split the retail sector. Major supermarket Coles dissociated
themselves from it.
Daily
Telegraph 11/8/10 Woolworths
followed, repudiating retail groups' "deceptive behaviour"; one umbrella group, Australian Association of
Convenience Stores, also withdrew. Telegraph 13/8/10.
Health groups
including ASH wrote to ACCC objecting to the "misleading and deceptive" campaign; noted AAR was hastily formed with
sole shareholder and sham address, and campaign was from the tobacco industry, not small
retailers. Melbourne
Age 14/8/10
EVIDENCE AND RESOURCES
The
legislation
Introduced July
2011.
Read the two Australian Acts: Tobacco
Plain Packaging Act 2011
and Trademarks
Amendment (Tobacco Plain Packaging) Act 2011
This followed
submissions
to public consultation, May-June 2011 - many
supportive submissions from individuals, governments,
health, medical and child protection/welfare organisations including:
ASH
Australia Protecting
Children from Tobacco coalition (42 NGOs)
World
Health Organization Tasmanian
Government
... and many individuals, including Anita
Lorenz who wrote:
Time
to stop mincing words – anyone who makes any profit from tobacco, right
along the supply chain, needs to be made to understand that they are dealers
of death the same as any other drug dealer.
House
of Reps inquiry July-Aug 2011 including more submissions and hearing transcripts
House of Reps debate - Hansard proof 24/8/11 - the bills
pass the lower house
Tobacco
Facts: Plain Packaging of Tobacco - ASH
Australia's 2 page factsheet, 2011
Plain
Packs evidence review -
two decades of independent research, May 2011
Plain
packaging: the facts - Cancer Council Victoria
Cancer
Council Australia position statement
Packaging
impact research
Plain
packs focus eyes on health warnings: study
May
2011: Study of eye movement shows non-/less frequent smokers (e.g.
children, would-be quitters) more likely to look at health warnings on plain than
branded packs. Plain packaging "appears to increase visual attention
towards health warning... and away from brand information." Abstract
and Guardian 30/5/11
Two
decades of evidence for plain packs: research review
May
2011: 20-year review of research on plain packaging shows
it will improve effectiveness of health warnings, reduce misconceptions
and appeal, especially to children. Quit/Cancer
Council Vic review of published studies also finds no trademark or other
legal barriers; tobacco industry claims about illicit trade
"exaggerated and misleading." Evidence review May 2011
Current packs mislead smokers: study
20% of smokers wrongly believe some tobacco brands
safer than
others, says 2011 worldwide study including 2000 Australians. Over 40%
still wrongly believe "light" brands (suggested by pack colours)
less harmful. Study in Addiction journal boosts case for plain
packs. Addiction
release 12/4/11
Plain packs influence
teens: study
Plain tobacco packs
discourage teens from smoking, says Auckland Uni findings presented at 2010 regional
conference in Sydney. Study of 14-15-year-olds shows plain
packs highlight health
warnings, reduce social appeal. APACT
conference release 7/10/10
Pack colours and design
mislead smokers
Colours of cigarette packs can mislead smokers into thinking
certain brands are less harmful, says 2009 study. Full
study pdf Sydney
Morning Herald report 5/8/09
Legal arguments
January 2012: Australia's plain tobacco packaging laws have a good prospect
of resisting tobacco industry legal challenges, say independent legal
experts in the Journal of the Australian Medical Association. Full
paper
2011: "The world is no longer Big Tobacco's ashtray" -
tobacco industry's legal tactics analysed by Prof Simon Chapman of the
University of Sydney in an ABC Radio National Law Report feature.
ABC
The Drum opinion 24/11/11
2011: Tobacco industry legal arguments
against plain packs dismissed as "huff and
puff" by Australia's Health Minister and "largely vexatious"
by legal experts. Minister
Roxon rejects the industry's legal threats as "huff and puff"
and quotes legal experts' opinions that the legislation is consistent with
international law. Minister
release 14/9/11
Experts quoted include A/Prof Matthew
Rimmer,
ANU intellectual property law specialist, who tells Senate inquiry tobacco industry legal
threats are in his view "largely
vexatious"; the bills are consistent with Australian laws and treaty
commitments; that Big
Tobacco claims
for billions in compensation are "outlandish" and
"greedy" in light of its "untold damage" to health. ANU
release 14/9/11
2011: Tobacco industry legal claims against the plain packaging
legislation are assessed by Melbourne University legal experts in a paper called
“Time
to Quit? Assessing International Investment Claims Against Plain Tobacco
Packaging in Australia”. Abstract
2010:
Anti-plain
pack legal arguments by tobacco-linked Institute of Public Affairs
think-tank hammered in 2010
Melbourne Uni debate by world intellectual property law
expert Prof Mark Davison - concludes "They haven't got a case." Prof
Davison's earlier comments, Melbourne
Age 4/5/10
Other
tobacco
industry arguments
National
survey of illicit tobacco use shows industry claims fanciful
July 2011: National government
survey of 26,000+ Australians confirms tobacco industry claims on extent of illicit tobacco
exaggerated. 2010
National Drug Strategy Household Survey shows only 1.5% of smokers use loose
unbranded "chop chop" more than half the time; only
4.9% use it at all (down from 6.1% in 2007); just 4.6% of smokers think they may have bought counterfeit
cigs even once a month.
Demolishes tobacco industry claims that one in "5 or 6" cigs
sold in Australia is illicit. AIHW survey
Tables 3.11 & 3.12, pp. 39-40 Compare tobacco-commissioned
Deloitte
report, Feb 2011
and
BAT inquiry testimony
Plain
packs will have no impact on illicit purchase: study
Tobacco industry and its allies (see above) assert plain
packaging will boost illicit trade. Not so, says 2011 study of young
adults in European Journal of Public Health.
Abstract
History
Timeline
of key events in the battle for plain packaging
From
brand to bland - the demise of cigarette packaging
July 2011:
Excellent article in
British Medical Journal by Sydney University's Prof Simon Chapman and Becky
Freeman puts it in a nutshell with good references. BMJ
article 18/7/11
History
of Plain Packaging: world timeline from 1986-present
Great dot-point history resource from Physicians for a Smoke-free
Canada.
Public
opinion
Support
for plain packs outnumbers opposition by over 2:1
May 2011: Public support for
plain packaging is withstanding Big Tobacco's multi-million dollar mass
media onslaught. Community support still
outnumbers opposition by more than 2:1, says Newspoll phone survey of
1200+. It shows 59% approval to just 24% disapproval. ABC
News 29/5/11
Plain packs have strong public support -
including smokers
2011 survey of 4,500
Victorians shows very strong support for mandatory plain packs. 72% of all people - and 57% of
smokers. Quit
release 8/4/11 2008 NSW survey showed even higher
support: 78%. Walsh R et
al (2008) Aust N Z Public Health. 32:482-8 doi:
10.1111/j.1753-6405.2008.00284.x
Plain Pack Attack shoots tobacco industry in the foot
2011
survey shows tobacco-funded “retailer” ads increased
plain pack support. Quit
release 3/11
General
Preventative Health
Taskforce recommends plain packaging
2009 Taskforce report says Australia should adopt mandatory
plain packaging and larger health warnings. Action
Area 5, pp. 181-5 of NPHT
2009 report tobacco chapter
Tobacco packaging and
labelling
International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease comprehensive
2009 guide
including health warnings, misleading packaging, plain packaging,
evidence, legislation and implementation.
Study
shows how industry bluffed Canadian, Australian governments
Tobacco industry claims plain packaging will interfere with their
branding rights - but 2008 study
shows this is a bid to bluff governments. See also response
5/3/10 by ASH director Prof Simon Chapman
The case for plain
packaging of tobacco
Sydney University 2007 report
with illustrations
See some pics
of the industry's latest creative uses of packets as advertising -
limited editions, discount offers, health warning breaches and more.

TOBACCO INDUSTRY'S "PLAIN
PACK ATTACK"
"Despite
having a long-standing fondness for the gaspers, and a firm belief
that adults should be free to do whatever they like, I don't ever think
I have heard such nonsense in my life."
Long-time smoker David Penberthy's
comment,
Adelaide Advertiser 17/6/11
Philip
Morris International joins in High Court litigation
December 2011: Philip
Morris International Inc. has joined its Hong Kong subsidiary in suing the
Australian Government over plain packaging. PMI is taking action in the High
Court, along with other tobacco companies BAT, Imperial and Japan
Tobacco. Philip Morris Asia Ltd launched an arbitration case over the
law in November under Australia's bilateral investment treaty with Hong
Kong. Law360
20/12/11
JTI joins High Court
action: PRNewswire
14/12/11
Imperial,
JTI join in High Court actions
December 2011: Japan Tobacco
International, a minor player in Australia but a big worldwide tobacco
force, has added its High Court suit to legal actions take by other tobacco
companies. PRNewswire
14/12/11 Imperial High Court action:
MSNBC
report 5/12/11
BAT files
High Court challenge
December 2011: British American Tobacco as expected lodges a High Court suit
against the Australian Government, claiming the Plain Packs legislation is
unconstitutional in acquiring the company's trademarks without just
compensation.
BATA
release 1/12/12
Philip
Morris Asia sues
November 2011: After passage by parliament of the Plain Packs
bills, Philip Morris takes legal action as threatened, claiming the laws
infringe its rights under an Australia-Hong Kong trade agreement. Philip
Morris Asia files lawsuit: PM
Asia release 21/11/11 and Tobacco.org
news 21/11/11
Philip Morris suit is "frivolous treaty shopping" - earlier
comment by ANU
legal experts in Canberra
Times, 28/6/11
Retailer
group predicts chaos and devastation
November 2011: National
Independent Retailers’ Assoc claims plain packs laws will “create
chaos” and that only 8 weeks between ban on manufacturing and 1/12/12
final ban on stocking “could be devastating to small independent
retailers”. NIRA
release 17/11/11 (not online)
US
business friends of Big Tobacco lobby Australian PM
November 2011: Tobacco-allied
US groups -
US Chamber of Commerce, National Association
of Manufacturers, Emergency Committee for American Trade, US Council for
International Business, National Foreign Trade Council, US-ASEAN Business
Council and TransAtlantic Business Dialogue issue statement after Senate
passage of plain pack bills, reiterating “deep concerns” at “draconian
assault” that “will violate Australia's international trade obligations
and undermine the rules-based international trading system, without
advancing public-health objectives.” The groups
report that “Some of us were able to relay these concerns directly to the
Prime Minister in a meeting related to the APEC Leaders Summit in Hawaii.”
US
Chamber of Commerce and 6 other groups release 13/11/11 no PR47284 at www.asianetnews.net
Retailer front claims small business let down by parties
November 2011: Tobacco industry-funded Alliance
of Australian Retailers says Senate passage of plain packs bills shows ALP
and Coalition have “failed to stand up for small business”; claims the laws will “make it harder for small retailers… to
quickly identify cigarette packs and to serve our customers
quickly.” AAR
release 10/11/11 (not online)
Rollie
packs sent to Senators
November 2011: Imperial Tobacco sends packs of roll-your-own products to
senators to “demonstrate packaging difficulties”
in plain packs bills. Packs are “absolutely not a gift”, company
insists. Sydney
Morning Herald 9/11/11 “Tobacco pack for senators” (not
online)
Revised
timetable still not good enough, says Imperial
November 2011: The five-month delay in the Plain Packs timetable
announced by Health Minister Roxon is still not good enough for Imperial
Tobacco - it claims to need 11-17 months from when the legislation is
finalised to comply. ACAPMA
news 2/11/11
More
"vexatious" FOI requests from tobacco industry
October 2011: The tobacco industry
continues to swamp the Department of Health with Freedom Of Information
applications – 35 are current. The department seeks advice on how to deal
with what it calls the “vexatious” requests.
Canberra
Times 19/10/11
BAT still
"needs more time"
October 2011: After the legislation is delayed in the Senate, BAT Australia
argues the delay makes it "impossible for the industry to comply"
with the legislation's timetable and that there would be "no legal
tobacco on the shelves" after the then-proposed July deadline. BAT
release 14/10/11
Philip
Morris warns of "longer queues"
October 2011: A Philip Morris Ltd website warns plain packs will cause
"greater confusion" and "longer queues" in orchestrated
campaign to target individual MPs in the leadup to Senate voting on the
legislation. "I
deserve to be heard"
BATA
exploits refugee doubt to question plain pack legality
September 2011: BAT Australia places full-page ads in major newspapers exploiting legal controversy over refugee
policy to cast doubt on legality of plain tobacco packaging bills. The ad
asks "Is the government's legal advice on shaky
ground?" BATA
ad in Sydney Telegraph 7/9/11, p. 22 Tobacco case "largely
vexatious": legal expert ANU
release 14/9/11
BATA
challenges bills in High Court
September 2011: British American Tobacco
Australia applies for special leave to appeal in the High Court
to gain access to Australian government legal advice on the plain packaging
bills. BATA threatens to mount a High Court challenge
to the bills if passed by the Senate. BATA
release 5/9/11
Tobacco
loses bid to dig out government's privileged legal advice
September 2011: BAT Australia and Philip Morris fail in their attempts
to get access to government legal advice on plain packaging, ruled legally privileged by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal and Federal Court. Tobacco
legal actions "huff and puff": Minister
Roxon release 14/9/11
Philip Morris lost its action in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal - it ruled the advice legally
privileged with no overriding public interest in revealing it.
Canberra
Times 20/8/11 and
AAT
decision 15/8/11 in Philip Morris Ltd v Prime Minister
[2011] AATA 556 on FOI application by PML June 2010 for access to
documents held by the Prime Minister's office. Philip
Morris did not appeal.
BATA was joined as a party to PMI's appeal to the AAT; but Full
Federal Court appeal was lodged by BATA alone, seeking access to 1995
legal advice held by the Dept of Health - Bloomberg
news 3/8/11
... this appeal was also lost - Federal
Court decision published 23/8/11. BAT "disappointed", may appeal to High Court
- Melbourne
Age 23/8/11
Democracy
Institute: Plain packaging "silly" (but tobacco-paid junkets
are not)
August 2011: Transatlantic think tank the Democracy Institute opposes
plain packs in submission
to the House of Reps inquiry and in
media articles in Australia and NZ. The Institute has a history of
connection with the tobacco industry, which funds some of its publications
and travel. The tobacco industry tries to persuade NZ not to follow Australia in legislating for plain packs. Dominion
Post NZ, 17/8/11
- see at bottom acknowledgment that author's trip to NZ was funded by
Philip Morris
Indonesia,
Mexico complain plain packaging will "hurt trade"
August
2011: Indonesia and Mexico have made submissions to the
Australian parliamentary inquiry complaining that mandatory plain tobacco packaging
is "unnecessarily restrictive" and a "barrier" to their
tobacco trade. Melbourne
Herald Sun 16/8/11 and
inquiry
submissions - Indonesia no. 56, Mexico no. 58
BAT
bull, bullying, bluff and bafflement in plain pack hearing
August
2011: British American Tobacco Australia chief David Crow tells parliamentary hearing the proposed
timetable for mandatory plain packs is "impossible", will
cause shortages and feed black markets. Health leaders say the industry is
"bluffing" and had years of warning. Melbourne
Age, 5/8/11
Also
addressing the House of Representatives committee reviewing
the bills: the National Preventative Health Agency, Dept of Health,
major health groups - who outlined worldwide evidence, warning tobacco industry claims
could not be trusted. Inquiry
site including transcripts
Claims in the Crow testimony include:
- "No
evidence" for effectiveness. But
see the
evidence
-
"Lack of engagement, consultation and transparency" in the
process. But BAT had several meetings
with government departments, and contributed to the open
public consultation
-
"All consumer advertising is gone; it is banned." Oh
yes? see pack
advertising and other
tobacco promotion including to retailers; and promotion
in movies and use of internet
including YouTube
-
BAT needs more time: "12 and 12" (12 months to change, 12 more to clear old stock). These
times differ from BAT written submission and within the verbal
presentation. And the change was announced in April 2010!
- "By the end of this
year, in very close to all of Australia, the product will be behind steel
doors." No mention of steel
doors as requirement in any Australian law.
- Four different estimates in Crow testimony of illicit
tobacco as proportion of total Australian tobacco trade: "15.6%", "16%", "one in five
and a half" [18.1%] and "one in five"
[20%].
Difference between 15.6% and 20% would be over 100m cigarettes.
Even 15.6% is
fanciful - real figure less than 5%, says much larger and independent 2010
AIHW survey
Tables 3.11 and 3.12, pp. 39-40
-
Tobacco-funded Deloitte report on illicit trade "based on thousands of
interviews". Actually less than
one thousand. Compare with over 26,000 surveyed by
AIHW
-
Illicit tobacco has additives that are "not smart to smoke and that we
would never be allowed to use under Australian law". Additives
and contents of tobacco are not regulated under Australian law
- "... we are talking about a
smoker who has chosen to smoke. They are 18 and over; they are an
adult." Wrong. Most smokers start well
before 18. Average age of smoking uptake in Australia in just
under 16. A key aim of plain packaging is to deter youth uptake.
Tobacco
industry and supporters line up in anti-plain packs submissions
August 2011: Publication of submissions to public
consultation
and parliamentary
inquiry show a formidable lineup of tobacco companies,
retailers and tobacco-allied entities opposing plain packs. The list
includes Australia's "Big 3" tobacco giants, BAT, Philip Morris
and Imperial, and also:
Brazil
Intellectual Property Assoc, AIPPI (world intellectual property body) Australia, Alliance of Australian Retailers, American
Legislative Exchange Council, APCO service stations, Australasian Assoc of
Convenience Stores, Australasian
Convenience and Petroleum Marketers Assoc, Australian Newsagents'
Fed, Australian Retailers' Assoc, Business Civil Liberties, Cigarworld
Australia, Cigar Retailers Assoc, Convenience and Mixed Business Assoc, CTC tobacconists,
Democracy Institute, economiesuisse, Emergency Committee for American Trade,
European Cigar Manufacturers’ Assc, Free Choice stores, Habanos SA Cuba,
“I Oppose Plain Packaging” campaign (1,100 identical form letters),
Indonesian Government, Institute for Policy Innovation,
Institute of Patent and Trademark Attorneys of Australia,
International Assoc for Protection of Intellectual Property, International
Chamber of Commerce, International Trademark Assoc, Japan Tobacco
International, Master Grocers Australia-Liquor Retailers Australia, Mexican
Government, National
Assoc of Manufacturers, National Assoc of Retailer Grocers Australia,
National Foreign Trade Council, Nicaraguan Government, Pacific Cigar Co, Property Rights Alliance,
Scandinavian Tobacco, Service Station Association, Tobacco Station
Group, Transatlantic
Business Dialogue, US Council for International
Business.
BAT
pushes to see old government legal advice
August 2011: BAT urges Federal Court to order the Australian Government to
release past legal advice leading to its decision in 1995 not to pursue plain packaging.
Government argues the advice is privileged and
confidential. Philip Morris also appealed FOI refusal. Bloomberg
news 3/8/11
Big
Tobacco misleads retailers; offers Fiji hols for pushing
July 2011: Some retailers are concerned at misleading flyers distributed
to them by
Imperial Tobacco urging them to protest about plain packs to current House of Representatives inquiry.
Meanwhile BAT Australia criticised by ASH for offering Fiji holidays to
retailers pushing tobacco. Imperial
flyers and Telegraph
report 24/7/11
Nat
MP says tobacco companies "coaching" spam calls to MPs
July
2011: WA Nationals MP Tony Crook says tobacco companies intentionally
misleading people and "coaching" anonymous
"spam" calls to MPs protesting the plain packs bills. Crook says his office
has had regular calls from angry people raising same issues. ABC
news report 11/7/11
Smiling smoothies behind BAT pack attack
July
2011: Details emerge about who ran the BAT campaign against plain packs: G2
ad agency set up by worldwide PR/marketing giant WPP. Read about the
"smiling ad smoothie" who loves "vice clients" and finds
pushing Big Tobacco's line "satisfying". The
Australian 18/7/11
Retailer front group claims "no real
evidence"
June 2011: Tobacco-funded Alliance of Australian Retailers claims in its
submission to the government consultation there's "no real
evidence" for plain packaging effectiveness. AAR
submission So presumably none of this evidence
is "real"
"Retailer"-commissioned report
warns of impact on tobacco buyers' practices
June 2011: Deloitte survey of retailers and customers commissioned by
tobacco industry-funded Alliance of Australian Retailers claims plain
packs will shift consumers from smaller to larger retailers. Plain
packaging and channel shift report June 2011
Survey is "junk research", says Prof Simon Chapman:
ABC online 6/7/11 Minister brands tobacco survey
"bogus", "deceptive": Telegraph,
Sydney 12/7/11
Legal
action
June 2011: Philip Morris launches lawsuit against the proposed plain
packaging law, claiming it will cause problems for investment protected
under an Australia-Hong Kong trade agreement. Philip
Morris media release 27/6/11 Report in
The
Australian 27/6/11
Philip Morris suit is "frivolous treaty shopping" say ANU
legal experts in Canberra
Times, 28/6/11 and see
Melbourne
Uni legal experts assessment, August 2011
BAT
beats up illicit trade threat
June
2011: BAT launches new Illicit
Tobacco website featuring inflated, fanciful
"costs" of illicit tobacco to individual electorates. These
figures are drawn from a flawed Deloittes report commissioned by the
Big 3 tobacco companies. See
critique
of the Deloitte report
Imperial
claims "Nanny State"
June 2011:
Imperial Tobacco launches huge "No Nanny
State" campaign - media ads, website,
postcards
to MPs and lifesized
cutouts carpet-bombed into retailers. "Nanny State" line
ignores evidence
that plain packs will
discourage child uptake - main
source of smoking recruitment.
"Nanny
State" is pure fairytale: SMH
online 28/6/11
BAT
involved in "reprehensible" smuggling "BAT-up"
June 2011: Paid British American Tobacco informant makes wild claims on
tobacco smuggling - and people smuggling! - on Channel 9's A Current
Affair. Scathingly reviewed on ABC-TV's Media Watch.
MediaWatch
report and transcript with ACA excerpts 13/6/11
Tobacco
industry's arguments "factoids and legal bollocks"
Crikey.com article by Prof Simon Chapman shows how claims of legal
infringements and $3m compensation payouts have been concocted by the
tobacco lobby. Crikey
9/6/11
BAT stalls as public
consultation ends
British American Tobacco has sought a longer delay in
introducing mandatory plain packs, arguing that a July 1, 2012 start
date is "unworkable" and "unrealistic". BAT makes
the plea in its submission to public consultation on the plain pack bill
(closed June 6). The
Australian 8/6/11
Big tobacco
"scared", insulting our intelligence
Good critique of tobacco industry arguments by Ross Gittins, Sydney
Morning Herald business reporter. SMH
Business Day 30/5/11
International Chamber of
Commerce says plain packs "bad public policy"
May 2011: International Chamber of Commerce attacks Australia's "bad public policy",
claims "dangerous precedent" on trademarks; repeats other tobacco industry claims
- increased counterfeiting, other countries "rejected",
"no research". Doesn't mention BAT is an ICC member. ICC
release 28/5/11 and ICC
members include BAT
Malaysia lobbied to
derail plain packs bill
May 2011: High-powered US
consultant linked to tobacco industry has lobbied Malaysia to oppose
Australia's plain packaging laws; powerful US congressmen help the industry use its "global economic power" to block
the world-first bill. ABC
news report 26/5/11
British American Tobacco
threatens legal action, price war
BAT
media
release 17/5/11 again threatens legal action against plain
packaging, warns of price-cutting war to counter it. BAT
launches
anti-plain
pack website
Response in ASH
release 17/5/11 Also Prof
Simon Chapman comment 17/5/11 Tobacco threat
reveals $500m pa "ripoff" of smokers by company "gouging": Australia
Institute release 18/5/11
BAT says "UK... has put plain
packaging on the back burner" BATA
release 17/5/11
It hasn't. In 2010
UK Health Secretary said it
made sense to "look at less attractive packaging", that
"glitzy" packs might attract children to smoking.
Government announced March 2011 they’d consult on introducing plain
packs by end-2011. UK
Health Dept
and WORLD
- UK
BAT fumes at
legislation
April 2011: BAT makes usual veiled legal threats and
exaggerated claims of illicit trade increases.
BATA
release 7/4/11
Philip
Morris' flashy card trick
 |
 |
|
Philip Morris pack
inserts (from April 2011) - carrying
the company's authorisation and pointing smokers
to their website (below) |
The cards, complaining
about retail display bans and plain packaging, were slipped into some PM
brands
and handed around in pubs/clubs. |
Philip
Morris plain packaging website (launched April 2011) shows they see it as a
major threat; wrongly assert "no evidence for it", "won't
work", will boost illicit trade and violate trademark rights. Legal
argument rubbished by trademark expert Prof Mark Davison in Melbourne
Age 4/5/10 and
detailed demolition
... but "smokers' rights" don't include
being told the truth or helped to quit
Secret tobacco documents show decades of health
interference. Australian references among more than 60,000
formerly secret industry docs show them aggressively blocking health reforms that would have helped smokers
quit; and hiding research on how their product wrecks babies' DNA. ASH
release 11/3/11 Latest
tobacco industry news and
Tobacco
Industry tactics
Tobacco-commissioned
report claims 16% tobacco sold is illicit
Feb. 2011: Deloitte report commissioned by Philip Morris, BAT and
Imperial claims as much as a sixth of all tobacco sold in Australia is
illicit. Deloitte
report on illicit tobacco, Feb 2011
See
critique
Big tobacco repackages Plain
Pack Attack
Feb. 2011: The Plain Pack Attack by Australia's Big 3 tobacco companies, fronted by a retailer
group, was revived in new media ads airing from February 2011. Once
again they wrongly claim plain packs "won't work" and
have been "rejected" elsewhere. ASH
media release 22/2/11 and
the
ads
Tobacco companies stall
reforms at $360,000 taxpayer cost
Feb. 2011: Philip Morris and BAT seek thousands of files on proposed reforms under Freedom Of
Info - huge drain on Health Dept time, costing
taxpayers over $360,000.
Greens
release 24/2/11 and Tobacco
FOI application details Tobacco throws everything at
plain packs: The
Australian 21/10/10 Big
tobacco wasting government's time: ASH/Quit
release 21/10/10 ... and recycling flawed legal
arguments: ASH
release 22/10/10 Legal ploy: SMH
report 23/10/10 with ASH comment
How Big
Tobacco pulls the strings
2010: Leaked documents show "retailers" campaign closely controlled by Philip Morris. $4m more Big Tobacco dollars earmarked for
more ads. Philip Morris also managed campaign PR, approved media talent,
managed lobbying of government. SMH 11/9/10 and AAP-SBS
report 11/9/10
Tobacco's "endless
challenge"
2010: Tobacco industry arguments against plain packs on pp. 24-25 of Aug 2010 Convenience
and Impulse Retailing
- also includes a feature on AACS (convenience umbrella
group) chief Sheryle Moon, before AACS was pulled from the
campaign by retailers embarrassed by its tobacco funding.
Big Tobacco uses retail front to do its dirty work
2010: Tobacco industry paid $5m (more later) to retail front group to run
mass media ad
campaign during Federal election. Condemned by health groups including ASH
and by Open
Letter 11/8/10 from six Australians of the Year. Major
retailers Coles and Woolworths repudiated the ads.
Tobacco industry marshals
powerful friends to oppose reform
2010: Powerful tobacco industry allies - US-ASEAN Business
Council, International Chambers of Commerce, others - made
submissions to Australian Senate inquiry into plain packaging. Local input included 16 retailer groups, 4 manufacturers, 2
right-wing think tanks. See
submissions
list
Tobacco industry tries to
bluff Rudd out of plain pack plan
2010: Tobacco companies use
"very silly" myths to try to block a proposal for plain
tobacco packaging recommended by the National Preventative Health
Taskforce. See Crikey
comment 5/3/10 by ASH director Prof Simon Chapman
Philip Morris scares
retailers
2009: Tobacco giant Philip Morris' glossy scare campaign to
Australian tobacco retailers against plain packaging -
claiming it would be "very difficult" for retailers,
"increase security risk", "inconvenience customers", "limit consumer choice". See
pics
of the Philip Morris campaign
Tobacco industry's phoney
campaign against plain packaging in Australia
2009: Study presented at world conference shows how tobacco industry
worked to mislead Australian and Canadian governments with
"phoney" arguments against plain packaging. Study
The
international campaign against plain
packaging
An
array of influential organisations and companies has lined up alongside
Philip Morris, BAT and Imperial to oppose the Australian government's decision to mandate
plain tobacco packaging.
Overseas-based
opponents making submissions against plain packs or lobbying the
Australian government have
included:
American Legislative Exchange
Council; Business Civil Liberties; Democracy Institute; Economiesuisse;
Emergency Committee for American Trade; European Cigar Manufacturers'
Association; Filtrona C&SP (UK); Habanos SA (Cuba), International Chamber of Commerce; International Trade Mark Association;
Japan Tobacco International; National Association of Manufacturers
(US); National Foreign Trade Council (US); Property Rights
Alliance (US); Richland Express (tobacco company), Scandinavian Tobacco,
US-ASEAN Business Council; USA Chamber of
Commerce; Washington Legal Foundation; and an arm of the
Indonesian Trade Ministry.
Australian
retailer and business groups and companies opposing plain packaging have
included:
Amcor (packaging company), APCO Service Stations; Australasian
Convenience and Petroleum Marketers' Association; Australian Association of Convenience
Stores, Australian
Newsagents' Federation, Australian Industry (Ai) Group, Australian Retailers Association, Cigar Retailers' Association, Council of Small Business in Australia,
CTC (tobacconists), Free
Choice Stores, IGA (supermarket chain),
Independent Retailers Association, Master Grocers - Liquor Retailers Australia,
National Association of Manufacturers, Retail Confectionery and Mixed Business Association,
Ritchies Supermarkets and Liquor Stores, Service
Station Association, Smokelovers Australia (tobacconists), Tobacco Station
(tobacconists).
Senate
inquiry 2010 submissions and Plain
Packaging of tobacco consultation submissions, June 2011
Tips
for taking tobacco action - tell governments and MPs what you think
of plain packaging.
This link will help you become
an ASH supporter (no cost)
You
can also help us by supporting
us financially - or with your time and effort…..
|