Media release:                                                                         September 15, 2007

Health hazard in partly-enclosed pub smoking areas

 New study boosts call to separate smoking from working areas

 

New research has confirmed that partly enclosed “outdoor” smoking areas in pubs can expose patrons and staff to potentially harmful levels of secondhand smoke.

And smoke levels in indoor no-smoking spaces adjacent to smoking areas can also be unacceptably high, say health and employee groups – who are urging speedy and total separation of smoking from working, eating and child-accessible areas. 

Concerns over secondhand smoke levels in partly enclosed and adjacent areas have been confirmed by a preliminary University of Otago study of New Zealand pub smoking areas, presented this month to the Oceania Tobacco Control Conference in Auckland.*

The study found that fine particles in the air in “outdoor” (partly enclosed) areas of Wellington pubs was peaking at more than four times the WHO-recommended safe level for 24-hour exposure, and more than five times the outdoor background level.

Smoke drift from these areas was also causing adjacent indoor no-smoking areas to register particle levels more than three times the WHO-recommended level and almost four times the ambient level in some pubs.

Authors of the study recommend consideration of policy options including removing staffed bars from smoking areas and better separation of smoking from non-smoking areas, to protect staff and patrons including children.

Says Stafford Sanders, co-ordinator of the SmokeFree Australia workplace coalition: “These readings were taken in southern New Zealand bars in winter – when outdoor patronage would be low. You would expect readings in Sydney in summertime to be even higher.

“This confirms what previous research has shown: that the risk to staff and patrons from staffed semi-enclosed areas is unacceptable and should be ended urgently.

“What we have here is a violation of OH&S rights, and an immediate threat to the health of vulnerable patrons and workers – especially any with heart, asthmatic or other smoke-affected conditions. Children are also particularly at risk, as previous research has shown.

“In Australia, only Queensland and Tasmania have legislated adequately against this danger. Other jurisdictions need to separate smoking areas from working areas – including eating and gaming areas.

“The consequences of not doing so will be more preventable illness and potentially more deaths from secondhand smoke exposure.”

 

* Edwards R et al, “Smokefree policies: where to next?” preliminary findings presented 6/9/07 to OTCC Auckland

 

Comment:             Stafford Sanders, SmokeFree Australia             ph. (02) 9334-1823    m. 0412-070-194

 

* SmokeFree Australia coalition for clean safe workplaces:
Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Workers’ Union;  Musicians’ Union of Australia;  Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance; Australian Council of Trade Unions; Action on Smoking and Health Australia; The Cancer Council Australia; National Heart Foundation of Australia; Australian Council on Smoking and Health; Non-Smokers’ Movement of Australia; Australian Medical Association; Asthma and Allergy Research Institute.

Back to SFAust index                                                                                   Back to SFAust news page