Media release:                                                                         August 7, 2007

Hotels Association misleads over smoke ban impact
as “smokefree” rorts continue

The Australian Hotels Association (NSW) has been accused of misleading its own members and government to undermine smokefree pub and club laws and pre-empt their review - as widespread rorting of weak laws continues.

The SmokeFree Australia coalition of employee and health groups* has accused the AHA of making “inaccurate, exaggerated, unsubstantiated and misleading” claims in its July member newsletter Hotel News. 

Reporting on comments of a visiting Irish Republic rural hotel industry representative, the newsletter claims smoke bans in the Republic of Ireland in 2004 have led to:

1.       non-compliance and lost trade;

2.       more domestic fires “because drinkers would prefer to stay at home and smoke inside”;  and      

3.       more problems with domestic violence because “patrons… are less inclined to drink at their local”.

SmokeFree Australia co-ordinator Stafford Sanders responded:  “First, there’s no credible evidence of any loss of trade to Irish pubs from their smoke ban. Official figures show pub sales, falling before the change, recovered afterwards to healthy growth**; and the Irish Office of Tobacco Control reports 95% compliance.

“Second, the suggestion of an increase in domestic fires is nonsense, though the AHA has been claiming it for years. The Irish figures*** show there were fewer fires in 2005, after the ban, than in 2003, before it. That may be because the proportion of smoking households has actually fallen since the ban.

“Third, the absurd suggestion that the Irish ban has had an adverse impact on domestic violence is directly contradicted by official figures #  showing granting of domestic violence orders in fact fell from 2003 to 2005.

“These misleading statements come as the AHA and its allies continue their scare campaign against Australian smokefree laws.  They’ve complained constantly in the media of terrible losses – again, claims not supported by independent evidence, and contrary to ABS figures showing minimal impact. ##

“In NSW, the AHA has also tried to pre-empt a government review of the weak regulations by falsely painting it as a ‘backflip’ – though the review was long and publicly planned with the AHA’s full knowledge.

“These claims continue a thirteen-year campaign by hotel and gaming bosses to delay, weaken and now undermine smokefree laws aimed at protecting public health and work safety. The AHA has raised hardly a peep about health, addressing itself mainly to squeezing pokie profits from nicotine-addicted gamblers.

“With this in mind, the AHA has lobbied strongly in some states to further undermine smokefree laws by moving gaming machines into ‘outdoor’ smoking areas – threatening the health of employees and patrons, and contrary to responsible gaming principles. Some venues’ smoking areas are also offering video screens, live entertainment, free gifts and other inducements – against the whole intention of the smokefree laws.

“We call upon all governments to resist these misleading claims, stop the rorts, and do what the community wants:  make all remaining smoking spaces fully separate from working, eating and gaming areas.” 

 ** see Irish Central Statistics Office figures at  www.ashaust.org.au/SF'03/files/IrishUpdate0509.htm
*** see  www.environ.ie/en/Publications/StatisticsandRegularPublications/FireandEmergencyServices/
# see Irish Central Statistics Office figures at  www.cso.ie/statistics/domestic_violence.htm
## see Allens report to NSW government at  www.health.nsw.gov.au/legal/pdf/ris_final.pdf  pp.21-26

Comment:             Stafford Sanders, SmokeFree Australia             ph. (02) 9334-1823    m. 0412-070-194

  * SmokeFree Australia coalition for clean safe workplaces:
Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Workers’ Union;  Musicians’ Union of Australia;  Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance; Australian Council of Trade Unions; Action on Smoking and Health Australia; The Cancer Council Australia; National Heart Foundation of Australia; Australian Council on Smoking and Health; Non-Smokers’ Movement of Australia; Australian Medical Association; Asthma and Allergy Research Institute.

Back to SFAust index                                                                                   Back to SFAust news page