Media release:                                                                         April 7, 2006

Secondhand smoke may trigger diabetes: study

 New evidence of health risk from smoky workplace loopholes  

 

A new study has suggested for the first time that secondhand smoke may spark diabetes.

The 15-year US study, to be published this week in the prestigious British Medical Journal*, says inhaling others’ tobacco smoke raises by more than 40% the risk of glucose intolerance, a precursor of Type 2 Diabetes – the main form, suffered by almost  million Australians.

The study has led to renewed calls for Australian state and territory governments to urgently review their regulations on smoking bans in workplaces – to ensure effective total indoor smoke bans and ensure that any remaining smoking areas are substantially unenclosed, separate and unserviced.

The study tracked more than 4,500 men and women from 1985 to 2000 in the US cities of Birmingham, Alabama; Chicago; Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Oakland, California.  During this period, 22% of smokers developed glucose intolerance – and 17% of non-smokers exposed to secondhand smoke, well ahead of the non-smoker non-exposed rate of 12%.

Passive smoking was first identified as a health risk in 1992, and has been associated with heart disease and cancer - but not, until now, with diabetes.

Says SmokeFree Australia** spokesperson, Action on Smoking and Health CEO Anne Jones:
”Governments can’t ignore the new research on the basis that decisions have already been made. Recent studies have suggested that passive smoke contains more dangerous ingredients than previously thought.

“Each new study on secondhand smoke harm points more strongly to the need to revise past decisions and make new and clearly enforceable rules consistent with the need to protect public health and occupational safety.

“If smoky workplaces loopholes are left as they are in NSW, Victoria, ACT, SA and the NT, serious and potentially fatal health harm will result. There will be preventable disease, disability and death - and venues will be quite rightly held legally accountable for failing to remove this toxic hazard.”

 

* Houston T et al in BMJ (2006), abstract at  http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/abstract/bmj.38779.584028.55v1?hrss=1 

 

Comment:             Anne Jones, ASH Australia                                  m. 0417-227-879
                
Stafford Sanders, SmokeFree Australia             ph. (02) 9334-1823    m. 0412-070-194

 

** SmokeFree Australia coalition for clean safe workplaces:
Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Workers’ Union;  Musicians’ Union of Australia;  Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance; Australian Council of Trade Unions; Action on Smoking and Health Australia; The Cancer Council Australia; National Heart Foundation of Australia; Australian Council on Smoking and Health; Non-Smokers’ Movement of Australia; Australian Medical Association; Asthma and Allergy Research Institute.

Back to SFAust index                                                                                   Back to SFAust news page