END THE UNHEALTHY LOOPHOLES 

Despite welcome changes, serious "black holes" remain in most Australian states and territories 
- leaving thousands of workers and patrons at serious health risk from secondhand smoke. 

Remaining problems include:


Crowded, staffed smoking areas:

- Leave workers and patrons dangerously exposed to the known serious harm of secondhand smoke. Any exposure is dangerous, and continuous/repeated exposure more so -  including exposure in partly-enclosed or open space.  See the latest  research

- Are based on very complex calculations of wall and ceiling ratios - leaving patrons and proprietors confused, complaints difficult, and avoidance inevitable.

- Deny the public what it wants: genuinely smokefree drinking and dining, with anyone wanting to smoke having to go outside (really outside, not partly).

- Violate basic OH&S rights and undermine Disability Discrimination and Occupational Health and Safety laws and international treaty obligations.  See  the legal/treaty background

- Threaten children's health, since some smoking-permitted areas also permit children.


We need your support now to end these loopholes!  
Contact us: email staffords@ashaust.org.au or ph. (02) 9334-1823 and find out how to make your voice heard.

NSW:  Email NSW leaders NOW: end the loopholes

Partly-enclosed smoking areas are proven unsafe
See evidence that most so-called "outdoor" smoking areas are unsafe for wiorkers and patrons, exceeding WHO-recommended exposure levels. See  SmokeFree Australia media release 15/8/08  with link to air quality study presentation

See our factsheet: Tobacco Facts for MPs (NSW)  (Winter 2007)
Weak "smokefree" laws leaving staffed, partly-enclosed smoking areas are not good enough - to finish the job, all smoking areas however enclosed should be made effectively separate from working and eating areas.

More at our Taking Action page      

See  very latest research on health harm from secondhand smoke

 

WHAT SMOKEFREE AUSTRALIA WANTS:

While our members have slightly differing views in some respects on this, as a coalition our minimum position is:

 

Simple and safe: the Queensland model
 
The best models to prevent avoidance of deadlines and protect workers and the public are the laws in Tasmania and  Queensland: see Nobody smokes here anymore  - new Qld government website including the new legislation and associated public education campaign.  The Queensland legislation is particularly effective, its bans including any contiguous (attached to main building) area where food or drink is served, where food is consumed, or where entertainers are working. It thus avoids depending heavily on complicated mathematical formulae defining "indoor" or "enclosed" - as other jurisdictions (NSW, Vic, ACT, SA) have become mired in.  See SmokeFree Australia release 9/3/05

In Queensland it was decided to avoid public and industry confusion over complicated wallspace area calculations - by not only making 100% of indoor areas smokefree, but also 100% of outdoor areas serving food and beverages. To avoid the indoor/outdoor definition further, no less than 50% of all other outdoor areas must be 100% smokefree. And if smoking is allowed at all outdoors it must be in a designated smoking area, being no more than 50% of the total outdoor area. A Smoking Management Plan must be provided for these areas. No food can be consumed in these areas (not even a pack of chips), no drinks can be served (people can bring their drink with them); and no entertainment can be provided in these areas. There must be a 1.2m barrier provided from other areas, or an impervious wall - no doors, windows or vents opening into indoor areas. 

Queensland has not yet ended the exemption for "high roller" gaming rooms - but it is now under review. So far, Tasmania, the ACT and SA have dropped the exemption. 

 

WHAT THE LATEST RESEARCH SAYS:

"Outdoor" smoking areas in pubs and clubs a health hazard
15/8/08: A new study has found more than half the partly-enclosed smoking areas of NSW licensed venues are over recommended smoke exposure limits - they're a threat to public health and occupational safety. SmokeFree Australia has called for immediate separation of all smoking from all working areas.  See  SmokeFree Australia media release 15/8/08  with link to air quality study presentation

 

Secondhand smoke causes blood, cell damage in  30 minutes: study
2/5/08: A new study of smoke in bars shows significant damage to blood vessels and stem cells. And the University of California (San Francisco) study says the harm can happen within 30 minutes of exposure.  See  UCSF media release 2/5/08   See study abstract   See  SmokeFree Australia media release 5/5/08

 

Meningococcal link with secondhand smoke confirmed
Feb. 2008: Analysis of victims of a meningococcal disease outbreak in Canada between 1999-2002 shows the three main risk factors were bar attendance, rave attendance and maternal smoking - all connected with secondhand smoke. Previous research has shown a link between secondhand smoke expoure and meningococcal risk.  
See  study abstract   


Passive smoking causes earlier onset of colon cancer
9/2/08: A study at the University of Rochester (US) Medical Centre has found that colon cancer occurs earlier in life for both active and passive smokers. The earlier the age of exposure to tobacco smoke, the earlier the onset of the disease.  
See  study abstract 

Outdoor exposure significant: tobacco a "toxic air contaminant"
30/10/07:  Updated US report from Air Resources Board (California) says exposure to secondhand smoke even in outdoor areas adjacent to smoking areas has been monitored at levels comparable to household exposure - i.e. proven harmful and potentially deadly. The report lists tobacco smoke outdoors as a "toxic air contaminant."  See report at  www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/ets/finalreport/finalreport.htm    See major findings on SHS health harm  - note that this predates more recent authoritative research on breast cancer casting much doubt on this link - see our health research page 

Health hazard in partly-enclosed pub smoking areas
15/9/07: A new study has shown partly-enclosed "outdoor" smoking areas are a health hazard to workers and patrons. The NZ study, presented to an international conference, shows smoke levels in these areas up to four times WHO-recommended safe levels. SmokeFree Australia has called for all states to ensure minimum separation of smoking from working (including eating and gaming) areas.   See  SmokeFree Australia media release 15/9/07

"Outdoor" areas unsafe to workers, heart/asthma sufferers, children: new study
8/5/07: Hospitality and dining workers and entertainers face serious health harm from secondhand smoke in crowded outdoor workplaces, says a major new study from Stanford University. It also points to acute risk to asthmatics and heart/artery disease sufferers, and exposure of children. SmokeFree Australia has called for urgent meetings to tighten smokefree laws and separate working and smoking areas.  See  SmokeFree Australia media release 8/5/07  including link to study

Workplace smoke can double lung cancer risk: new UN study
31/1/07: A major report co-authored by the UN's International Agency for Cancer Research (IARC) has shown workplace exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke can double lung cancer risk in the most heavily exposed. The worldwide review of studies published in the American Journal of Public Health concludes workplace exposure should be "eliminated" and recommends "tougher regulations and laws" against smoking in public places. Note that exposure to secondhand smoke happens irrespective of how enclosed the working area is.  See  IARC media release 31/1/0     See  review abstract        See  SmokeFree Australia media release 6/2/07 

Secondhand smoke can damage health at very low levels
17/10/05:  Research published in the international medical journal PLoS Medicine says there is "no safe threshold" for tobacco exposure and that they must be "virtually eliminated to protect human health."     See 
study pdf, PLoS Medicine Dec 2005 issue 

US ventilation engineers agree: only safe way is to ban smoking
30/6/05: Position paper from the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) concludes that "the only means of effectively eliminating health risk associated with indoor exposure is to ban smoking activity."   See  ASHRAE position document 30/6/05

Separate rooms and ventilation don't work

The community doesn't want partly-enclosed smoky rooms

More on the health harm to workers and the public from secondhand smoke
Note that all of this harm can be caused whether the exposure happens inside, partly inside or outside.

Smoked out: big tobacco's deals in clubland
11/7/08: Tobacco companies are paying Victorian pubs and clubs commissions for selling tobacco - showing the kind of connection that's frustrated and weakened smokefree pub and club laws. 
See  Melbourne Age report 11/7/08 

       

Back to  index